Compare and Contrast

 

Assignment: You want to buy a specific piece of equipment for your job; however, your immediate supervisor feels that a less expensive item would do the task.  You appeal the decision. The manager of the job site  asks you to write a report about the two items, as little is known about how they compare. Write a report comparing and contrasting the attributes of the two pieces.

Compare and Contrast

Compare/contrast (C/C) reports tend to be one of the most common, yet useful types of reports. Since we have had to make choices and distinguish between one thing and another all of our lives, most of us like to see how others make their decisions. We especially appreciate this strategy if it helps us or informs us in some way. For that reason, writing a well-developed, interesting compare/contrast report is a necessary tool for any writer.

A couple things to consider when writing C/C reports are organization and content. Remember a strong thesis statement which guides the report is a must.

Organization

Three common types of organization patterns exists for this type of writing:

Block Style -- choose either similarities or differences in the thesis, for example, rewritable compact discs (CD) are far superior to zip drives;
bulletin the first paragraph all the attributes of the first item are discussed, i. e., the traits of the compact disc;
bulletthe second paragraph compares (or contrasts) the second item to the first, making sure to address each point mentioned in the first body paragraph, i.e., while zip drive can hold up to two megabytes, a rewritable CD can hold seven times that amount;
bulletthe third body paragraph addresses what's significant or interesting about the comparison you have made, so that the reader knows exactly why you have written the report.
Item-by-Item -- again decide what you are discussing before you begin, either compare or contrast; again your thesis would point out your findings:
rewritable compact discs (CD) are far superior to zip drives;
bulletthe easiest of the three in this strategy, you discuss the first item in the first body paragraph in terms of both; both CDs and zip drives store vast amounts of information,
bulletand the second in the second; in addition, durability is also a measure that should be considered when choosing before purchasing either a CD or a zip drive;
bulletthe third in the third body paragraph; cost is the final attribute that needs considered;
bulletthe conclusion contains what's significant about the attributes you mentioned
Point-by-point is the final and most sophisticated type;
bullethere you organize by three or four key attributes, so that you can discuss either similarities or differences within each, i.e., zip and rewritable CDs cost, storage capacity, storage, and ease of access could be discussed in a point-by-point report -- a strong thesis is a must.

Content

When writing C/C, please be specific. Refer to level of abstractions to help you with this. Beginning writers too often leave out information the reader does not have. Having more information than one needs is preferred to not having enough. Remember, too, keep your focus narrow, avoiding vague generalities and unsupported opinion.

The parameters of this report then:

bulletAn explicit thesis statement is a must. An example: Rewritable compact discs (CD) are far superior to zip drives and can prevent financial loss for the corporation when the industry standards change.
bulletChoose one of the three organizational patterns listed above.

Go http://ol.scc.spokane.edu/jstrever1/models/ to see compare/contrast examples from former students.  While some of these are not reports, they show how the three different strategies can be used.

Contents within this site are copyrighted by both the author of essays and/or Jan Strever. The documents may be used freely by educators in the classroom; however, publication of any of these materials unless authorized by Dr. Strever constitutes blatant copyright infringement. The contents within these pages are solely those of the author, and S.C.C. should not be held responsible. ©1995--2010.
Last revised: 01/18/11 by Jan Strever -- jstrever@scc.spokane.edu
Personal site: http://www.strever.us/

Home Process Analysis Classification

Hit Counter