Levels of Interaction in Seminars

Discussion Grades

Silent:                      0 points

No response throughout seminar. Of various reasons for this behavior, two need to be considered in order not to sacrifice the group. Lack of trust in the group and therefore the unwillingness to take a risk and share; or lack of confidence in one's own critical abilities--a sense of being so overpowered by the material that it's hard to see the forest for the trees.

Silencing the text:              2 point

Personal opinions, experiences and/or memories dominate, without much consideration for the text. This behavior indicates an inability to engage and is often accompanied by complacency or boredom. Possibilities for learning are greatly reduced. Often the participant is judgmental or dismisses the text altogether.

Testing the water:            4 points

Some two or three general comments about the text to let people know s/he has read it. The participant is beginning to get the toes wet.

Collecting:                       6 points

Listing many observations and quotes from the text without analyzing them. The participant is still struggling a bit with being overpowered by the material, but what is important is that she is struggling with it.

Engaging:                         8 points

This signals real reading. In seminar it is usually accompanied by an emotional as well as an intellectual response to the material. At this level, participants are generally enthusiastic. Among the various responses possible: discussing the possible and biases of the author; seeking to define terms (both the author's and the discussants'); seeking to make meaning out of the quotes; asking questions; answering questions about the text posed by the group; clarifying each other's positions. This level indicates a strategy of learning.

Understanding:

At this level, participants are structuring and integrating the material through association with personal experience (here, personal experience illuminates rather than dominates the text) and with other literature. "Understanding" is not a question of categories, which can rob the subject of its uniqueness. Rather, it has to do with making meaningful connections.

And/or

Making Connections:              10 points

This level is the level of "critical" appreciation and respect. The participant has understood the material from whatever perspectives are available and now makes a conscious evaluation or judgment about it, acknowledging difference and inability to understand where appropriate.

 

 

Contents within this site are copyrighted by both the author of essays and/or Jan Strever.
The contents within these pages are solely those of the author and S.C.C.
should not be held responsible.  ©1999-2009
Last revised: November 19, 2009 by Jan Strever -- jstrever@scc.spokane.edu
Personal site:  http://www.js.spokane.wa.us/

Hit Counter