• Two Types of Outlines

    Informal Outlines

    An informal outline orders information and helps a writer gain clarity in thought; however, they are rarely acceptable for your professors. These types are generally for personal use only.


    Outlining helps pull together the results of your prewriting. When your purpose is a major research paper, an outline is a must; however, any essay pulls together better if directed by an outline.

    Outlines

    order ideas
    help prepare the thesis statement
    provide visual guides
    take the place of a checklist
    and perhaps most importantly, reveal flaws:
    missing information,
    undesirable repetitions,
    digressions from the thesis,
    unclear thinking,
    illogical transitions.
  • to help with sufficient evidence

  • as a checklist of info

  • Sample Informal Outline
    Thesis Statement: With the right training, any writer can use the outline to help organize and direct her essay
    to attain clarity of thought use indents and bullets
    transitions
    signify change of thought
    detail
    examples
    include notes to self about citations or exciting ideas
    when writing the first draft can use as a reference

    Formal Outlines

    Content and format are rigid in the formal outline. The two blend to display the relationships among ideas in an orderly fashion. A formal outline can be a topic outline or a sentence outline. Each item in a topic outline is a word or phrase; each item in a sentence outline is a complete sentence. Formal outlines never mix the two.

    Conventions of Formal Outlines

    Formal Outline Pattern
    Thesis Statement:
    I. First main idea
    A. First subdivision of the main idea
    1. First reason or example
      a. First supporting detail
      b. Second supporting detail

    2. Second reason or example
      a. First supporting detail
      b. Second supporting detail
    B. Second subdivision of the main idea
    1. First reason or example
      a. First supporting detail
      b. Second supporting detail

    2. Second reason or example
      a. First supporting detail
      b. Second supporting detail
    II. Second main idea
    A. First subdivision of the main idea
    1. First reason or example
      a. First supporting detail
      b. Second supporting detail

    2. Second reason or example
      a. First supporting detail
      b. Second supporting detail
    B. Second subdivision of the main idea
    1. First reason or example
      a. First supporting detail
      b. Second supporting detail

    2. Second reason or example
      a. First supporting detail
      b. Second supporting detail

    Traits of a Formal Outline

    Signal groupings and levels of importance with numbers, letters, and indentations;
    subdivide each level with more than one entry;
    use the same level of generality for all subdivisions;
    do not overlap headings, i.e., different points require different ideas;
    arrange phrases and sentences grammatically parallel;
    capitalize the first word of each entry;
    end each sentence in a sentence outline with periods but not the items in a topic outline;
    do not include introduction or conclusion;
    place the thesis statement above the outline itself.

    Sample Formal Outline

    Thesis Statement: Comparison of Teacher-student communication: A descriptive typology of students' interpersonal experiences with teachers and Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication.


    I. Rhetorical Analysis of the first article: Teacher-student communication: A descriptive typology of students' interpersonal experiences with teachers by R. West, a qualitative study "to provide communication researchers with a descriptive base of information, showing how students interpret what teachers say and do in the classroom."

    A. Topic and purpose discussed in a no nonsense manner, i.e., minimal use of acronyms, jargon and oblique references

    1. The introduction leads the reader into the piece by establishing rapport.
    2. In the first paragraph the direction, slant, tone are established

    B. Audience concerns are shown.

    1. Economy of language is missing.
    2. Diction is "acadamese"-less.
    3. Paragraphs are generally from 8- 13 lines long.
    4. It makes use of headings, subheadings and numbered categories for ease in reading.
    5. Article's length is suitable, 8 ½ pages.

    C. Ethos established through use of references which show a breath and depth of the field.

    1. References used from cognitive realm.
    2. Citations are include Vgotsky.
    II. Rhetorical Analysis of second article: Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication by J. Walther, J. Anderson, D. Park an article measuring the "effects of time restriction on social interaction in computer-mediated communication."

    A. Topic and purpose are obfuscated by the immediate introduction of an acronym, then a broad, and I do mean broad, spectrum which attempts to set up the topic under discussion.

    1. The introductory paragraph discusses the conflicts in the field, does not introduce purpose.
    2. The purpose is not stated until fourth paragraph.

    B. Audience concerns are not attended to.

    1. A brief knowledge base is presented.
    2. Assumes that readers are knowledge about computer interaction social theory.
    3. Does not aid the reader with use of bullets or numbering.
    4. Length is much too long: 27 pages.

    C. While ethos is established by the sheer amount of recognition of previous research, one wonders whether mention of select, key research would have worked better.

    IV. Methodology: Teacher-student communication: A descriptive typology of students' interpersonal experiences with teachers.

    A. standard research format is used: abstract, introduction, definition of terms, existing research, methodology, results, discussion for future.
    B. Terms are defined and the actual questionnaire is presented.
    C. Readers do not have to guess.
    D. On the minus side, there is a lack of understanding of why the criteria used for coding the responses was chosen.

    V. Methodology: Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication.

    A. Standard research format is used: abstract, establishing of problem, hypothesis, review of literature, methodology, findings and discussion.
    B. Since this was a study of various studies, the authors were limited in their sample.
    C. Tables were included.
    D. Endnotes added to the density of material.

    VI. Which is better? Audience is the answer.

     


    Contents within this site are copyrighted by both the author of essays and/or Jan Strever.
    The contents within these pages are solely those of the author and S.C.C.
    should not be held responsible.  ©1999-2009
    Last revised: November 19, 2009 by Jan Strever -- jstrever@scc.spokane.edu
    Personal site:  http://www.js.spokane.wa.us/

    Hit Counter