|
|
|
(Please disregard this if you have received consistent 14s on your journal entries.)
Some other points to ponder:
A non-Hallmark moment:
A final thought:
You are welcome to respond if you like: Name E-mail
Students were asked to: Please go to http://www.iraqjournal.org/photo/index.html Go through the entire photo series. After that go to one of the news magazines and read about the possible war that we will have with these people. Then discuss whether you believe an essay can be more powerful than a series of photos about the same event. Use exact examples and be specific, please. As you are reading, please note all level 1 occurences. JEs by Former Students:From: Joanna Constantine Words or Pictures?I think each can be persuasive, each can be disturbing, and each can make us feel uneasy or comfortable. Which is more powerful? That's a tough question. At Time.com I read an article called, "Is Saddam a Menace or a Nuisance?" In this article, the author, Tony Karon, says that the US feels Saddam is a menace; whereas, the old European view is that he is nothing more than a nuisance. Each view was represented well in the article. Mr. Karon used examples to back up both the menace and the nuisance stance; however, it left me unconvinced of either. I don't know whether war is right. I'm just a person who lives a long ways from where the war would take place. It seems surreal to me. I feel like if Saddam doesn't comply with the UN he should be punished, however, I don't know that blowing up innocent cities filled with families and children is the right punishment. I look through the photos and I see everyday people just like me. I see kids, parents, women. They're not holding guns, they're not threatening me in any way. They're smiling, waving, and being quite peaceful. Do the pictures make me think we shouldn't go to war. No, not necessarily. War dates back to biblical times. It's often a needed means to and end. I want to protect my family too, and if this means war with Iraq, then so be it. I guess my stance on pictures versus words would have to be this: words and pictures together seem to be the most moving to me personally. Had Mr. Karon's Feb. 19, 2003 article about Saddam shown pictures of Iraqi soldiers guarding weapons of mass destruction with Saddam's face painted on the wall behind them, I think I can say for sure that I'd pick war! And had the photos shown children crying, families torn apart, death and pain, I would've said war is so unfair -- it's wrong. But if it said "these children were ravished by United States soldiers who were following orders from President Bush. Many children lost their parents and are now orphans," I would have been heartbroken and hated that my country did this. But if the caption said, "Saddam Hussein said that any family who does not follow him will be punished and this is the children whose parents didn't follow." Well then I'd be pissed at Saddam and ready for the US to go kick some butt. I guess what I'm saying is that words make pictures come alive. Ok, there you have it, I picked which I like better. You can often give a very clear picture with words, but a photo without words is left up to us to fill in the caption, and it can often be incorrect. Photographs are a powerful tool, but without words they're just still frames with no life. Words give photos energy, real life, and words can tell us so much. I remember watching Pearl Harbor for the first time and being sickened by the death and horror it showed. I have seen lots of Pearl Harbor pictures, read about it in history classes, but with the movie, words written and spoken by people that we had grown to love throughout the movie, it was heartbreaking to see the death and mass destruction the Japanese had done. It made it so real for me. That movie was an essay, written to be performed, and it was performed so well that it made me angry, disgusted, and sad all at the same time. Words can be so powerful.
Brenda Garza Who to Blame for the Broken Heart?After viewing these photos the ones of the children especially broke my heart. The one with the little girl laying there starving was so sad and it is only going to get worse if we go to war with these people. In an article in the Spokesman Review it talked about where they were already having food rationed. It showed a man pushing a cart from the ration station which would feed his family one meal a day for one month. This car had three paper sacks, like our brown paper bags, three small, maybe one gallon sized buckets, one of flour, one of sugar, and one of rice, and a jug of oil. Can you imagine only three sacks of food a month to feed your family? Seems impossible, but it happens this way. Upon further viewing of these photos the children all have a look of fear to them. Even though they seem to be playing they all appear to be watching out as if in fear of the unknown. The women in the streets protesting all have a look of fear to them. Most of the kids clothes are tattered and look unkempt, like the boy in Jumurriyah, where they have raw sewage running through the streets. The only time the children show any lack of fear was at the book market picking out books that cost their fathers $2:00, 1/3 of their monthly income. Another very saddening sight was the conditions of their jails. Yes, these people did commit a crime and need to pay for it, but they treated them worse than animals. They had no beds or anything, just a plain old concrete floor to sleep on. Yet then why did Saddam Hussein grant amnesty to all of them? Probably so they could be soldiers is the United States goes to war with them. The exuberance shown in the faces of their families was a nice sight to see. That is probably not a normal sight for them living in constant poverty and fear. The people were actually praising Saddam for this act not knowing what could really be the underlying reason. Then another sad sight was the Doctor treating all the new cases of cancer that they expect are caused by the depleting uranium in bombs that the United States used against them in the gulf war. If we go to was with Iraq now the damages will be far greater and longer lasting. So to answer the question would an essay be more powerful than pictures about the same event? My own personal opinion is that a picture describes a thousand words and a million ideas can be composed from them. I do believe that these pictures tell a pretty good story, but they do not give a lot of facts. In that essence, an essay could much more explain and give more graphical details than the pictures do. Yet I wonder as people in such a prosperous nation if we could ever really understand the state that these people live in and going to war with them will only enhance it. It may give them more freedom in the end, but what will it cost them to get it -- Hundreds of lives of innocent children, women, and men, all so a point can be proven the President of the United States?
A Teacher's Journal ResponseFrom: Jan -- jstrever@scc.spokane.edu
|
Contents within this site are
copyrighted by both the author of essays and/or Jan Strever.
|